A Debate Pack which looks at the problems that can be caused by gambling addiction and asks whether gambling adverts should be banned on TV.
As has already been said, no-one has mentioned banning gambling, this is about putting additional controls in place in the industry with the aim of reducing problem gambling. Speaking more generally, I do believe smoking and gambling are comparable in that they are harmful, addictive and whilst neither should be banned they should be heavily regulated.
U.S. lawmakers are mulling several measures aimed at cracking down on online gambling by Americans. Read an email exchange on the issue between Rep. Jim Leach, an Iowa Republican behind a key bill.
Gambling can be seriously detrimental to your social well-being. 2. FREEDOM. We’re all adults, aren’t we? Do we really need a nanny state to regulate our behaviour? At the end of the day, it should come down to personal responsibility. If you want to go ahead and gamble, you should have the freedom to do so. It’s never a good idea to.
And for the last reason gambling sets a double standard for the government.Add a New Topic Add to My Favorites Debate This Topic Report This Topic Should gambling be legal? We don't think so and here we bring you 3 Feb 2014 For today's debate, we will be focusing on gambling and whether it should be banned within our society.
When a man plays cards by all forms of gambling should be banned debate way of gambling, he thinks he can make some quick and easy genting casino in japan money. From ancient time, throwing a dice has been a form of gambl. 6 Feb 2017 Do you think all forms of gambling should be banned watch. Little bets can turn into big winnings.
Gambling should be banned and illegal. Gambling is very controversial topic which generates a lot of frictions and discussions. On the one hand, democratic system proclaims a freedoom of living. Therefore, you can do everything what you want to do. You can waste your money, if you want to. On the other hand, gambling is very dangerous issue. It.
In your case, your burden would be to prove that the harms of outlawing gambling outweigh the benefits, and your opponent's burden would be the converse. Specific debate styles have different rules on how the burden should be split and there is a bit of grey area sometimes as to who receives the bulk of the BOP.